If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone. These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause issues for users. It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. http://deercamera71.jigsy.com/entries/general/What-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5G-cell-System for exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue. Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body areas. what is a safe distance from a cell tower can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer. Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower. While it sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas. However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems. This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body. https://nonon-centsnanna.com/members/masktext17/activity/121244/ is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues). This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards. Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
http://deercamera71.jigsy.com/entries/general/What-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5G-cell-System|what is a safe distance from a cell tower|https://nonon-centsnanna.com/members/masktext17/activity/121244/
